The Reality Check Self-Driving Car Companies Don’t Want to Discuss
As technology leaders, we continually evaluate emerging innovations and their implications for business operations. This week, Waymo’s co-CEO delivered a sobering reminder that even the most promising technologies come with inherent risks that organizations must acknowledge and prepare for.
Honest Assessment in a Hype-Driven Industry
During TechCrunch’s Disrupt summit, Waymo co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana made a statement that few tech executives would dare utter publicly: “We don’t say ‘whether.’ We say ‘when'” regarding the inevitable first fatality involving their autonomous vehicles.
This level of transparency is refreshing in an industry often characterized by overpromising and underdelivering. While Waymo’s safety record shows 91% fewer crashes compared to human drivers, Mawakana’s acknowledgment represents a mature approach to technology deployment—one that recognizes statistical improvements don’t eliminate all risks.

Lessons for Technology Implementation
For businesses considering autonomous vehicle integration or any transformative technology, Waymo’s approach offers valuable insights:
Risk Assessment Over Marketing Promises: Rather than making absolute safety guarantees, Waymo focuses on continuous improvement and preparation for potential failures. This methodology should guide any enterprise technology adoption.
Regulatory Navigation: The autonomous vehicle space highlights the challenges of operating in regulatory gray areas. When a Waymo vehicle illegally passed a school bus in Atlanta, questions arose about accountability in the absence of human drivers. Businesses deploying AI and automation face similar accountability challenges.
Operational Backup Systems: Waymo continues to employ remote operators who can intervene when vehicles encounter issues. This human-in-the-loop approach demonstrates the importance of fallback mechanisms, even in highly automated systems.
Industry Context and Competitive Landscape
Waymo’s measured approach contrasts sharply with competitors who’ve faced significant setbacks:
- Tesla has experienced multiple crashes and settled fatal accident lawsuits involving its Autopilot system
- GM’s Cruise recently resumed operations after a severe 2023 incident that resulted in multimillion-dollar settlements
- The regulatory framework remains undefined, mainly creating uncertainty for businesses and consumers alike
Technology Leadership Principles
Mawakana’s candid assessment exemplifies several key principles for technology leadership:
- Transparency builds trust: Acknowledging limitations strengthens credibility more than making unrealistic promises
- Continuous testing and improvement: Waymo regularly retests systems to address new scenarios and edge cases
- Stakeholder preparation: Rather than surprising users with failures, prepare them for realistic outcomes
- High safety standards: As Mawakana noted, maintaining “a high enough bar on safety that companies are held to”
Strategic Implications for Business
The autonomous vehicle industry’s maturation offers lessons applicable across technology sectors:
Risk vs. Reward Calculations: Organizations must weigh statistical improvements against absolute risks to determine the optimal balance. A 91% reduction in incidents still means incidents will occur.
Change Management: Societal acceptance of new technologies requires careful preparation and education, not just superior performance metrics.
Accountability Frameworks: As AI and automation become increasingly prevalent, businesses require clear protocols for addressing system failures or unexpected behaviour.
Looking Forward
The autonomous vehicle space will continue evolving rapidly, with regulatory frameworks, technology capabilities, and public acceptance all in flux. Waymo’s methodical, transparent approach may prove more sustainable than aggressive deployment strategies that prioritize speed over safety.
For technology leaders, the key takeaway isn’t about autonomous vehicles specifically—it’s about how we approach transformative technologies in general. Honest assessment of risks, continuous improvement processes, and transparent communication with stakeholders will distinguish successful technology implementations from costly failures.
As we evaluate emerging technologies for our clients and operations, Waymo’s approach reminds us that the most advanced solutions aren’t necessarily those that promise perfection, but those that deliver measurable improvement while honestly addressing their limitations.
The question isn’t whether new technologies will occasionally fail—it’s whether we’re prepared to manage those failures responsibly while capturing the broader benefits they provide.

